<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the 100 best music tracks of 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.denuology.com/the-100-best-music-tracks-of-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.denuology.com/the-100-best-music-tracks-of-2008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:14:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Top 100 Tracks of 2010 &#124; Denuology: The Observation and Observations of Denuo.</title>
		<link>http://www.denuology.com/the-100-best-music-tracks-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-6415</link>
		<dc:creator>The Top 100 Tracks of 2010 &#124; Denuology: The Observation and Observations of Denuo.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.denuology.com/?p=608#comment-6415</guid>
		<description>[...] around the corner, must be time for the Top 100. As always, this is not an exact science but that never stops me from painstakingly ranking each one. The list follows but first the same ol’ rules and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] around the corner, must be time for the Top 100. As always, this is not an exact science but that never stops me from painstakingly ranking each one. The list follows but first the same ol’ rules and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

