Cold Hard Facts vs. Warm Fuzzy Feelings
Posted by Lynn Lim | April 24, 2012Today I had my annual physical. This is a bit of a misnomer because I can’t remember the last time I had one and actually had to ask my doctor if she had forgotten to give me the exam. I thought it would be more…invasive. She said no – since I am healthy and young (to which I snorted), she didn’t need to poke and prod too much.
Anyway, during my visit, I got shot! No really, it was a Measles Mump Rubella booster, which I was told included the extra benefit of protection against pertussis – whooping cough. Yes, it’s back??? Despite Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s Vaccination and Autism study from 1998 being proven as false, people like Donald Trump still believe there is a link between the two. Why? Because the story tugs at our heartstrings – what parent would want to knowingly expose his or her children to risk?
So emotions sometimes win over hard facts, especially in cases like this where anecdotes are stickier than statistics. Look at your child and then look at the number zero. Which one would you remember? Feelings are appealing and stories are the perfect way to package them. That’s why companies are all about creating narratives right now, and obviously why this whole paragraph has been one big DUH.
But then I read something in the New York Times that left me confused, because even though I don’t agree with this particular outcome, I generally like when feelings win over data.




